Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Torres v. Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, et al.
as 24-514
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ALEXANDER TORRES
Defendant / Appellant:
LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, JIMMIE GATES, No. 111207 and others
De La Cruz et al v. Crazy Buffet 88, Inc. d/b/a Crazy International Buffet et al
as 7:2023cv00437
Plaintiff:
Ernesto De La Cruz, Abraham Gonzalez, Geovanny Rodriguez and others
Defendant:
Crazy Buffet 88, Inc. d/b/a Crazy International Buffet and Wen Bin Huang
Castillo v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2023pq00076
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
David Castillo
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Chevron U.S.A., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Alexander Torres v. Los Angeles Sheriffs Department et al
as 2:2022cv07450
Plaintiff:
Alexander Torres
Defendant:
Los Angeles Sheriff's Department, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Jimmie Gates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Handy v. Castillo
as 1:2022cv01160
Plaintiff:
Michael Handy
Defendant:
David Castillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CASTILLO v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv17660
Plaintiff:
DAVID CASTILLO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Castillo Gomez v. Garland
as 22-1049
Petitioner:
DAVID CASTILLO-GOMEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv10645
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 21-11159
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv01074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
