Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Koe et al v. Noggle et al
as 1:2023cv02904
Plaintiff:
Emma Koe, Amy Koe, Hailey Moe and others
Defendant:
Caylee Noggle, The Georgia Department of Community Healths Board of Community Health, Norman Boyd and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Nancy Doe and Linda Doe
Amicus Curiae:
American Academy of Pediatrics, Academic Pediatric Association, American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04924
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Bayless v. Crew
as 3:2021cv01142
Plaintiff:
Donald W. Bayless
Defendant:
David Crew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CREWS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv01601
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID CREWS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bayless v. Crews
as 3:2019cv01465
Plaintiff:
Donald Wayne Bayless
Defendant:
David Crews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bayless v. Crew et al
as 3:2019cv01371
Defendant:
Mike William, David Crew and Duval County Sheriff's Department
Plaintiff:
Donald Wayne Bayless
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bayless v. Crew
as 3:2019cv01254
Plaintiff:
Donald Wayne Bayless
Defendant:
David Crew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CREWS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv02720
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID CREWS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crews v. Martinez et al
as 1:2019cv03277
Defendant:
Joshua Blankenship, Brendan F Kelley and Vincent Martinez
Plaintiff:
David Crews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKenzie v. City and County of San Francisco et al
as 4:2018cv07141
Defendant:
George Gascon, David Crew, Jerry Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
Henry G. McKenzie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
