Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Brycen Daffern et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv05027
Plaintiff:
Brycen Daffern, David Dahl, Susan Dailey and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Daffern et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00817
Plaintiff:
Daffern, Brycen Daffern, David Dahl and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Daffern et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00817
Plaintiff:
Brycen Daffern, David Dahl, Susan Dailey and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Jason Alcaraz, et al v. StubHub, Inc., et al
as 22-15879
Not Classified By Court:
In re: STUBHUB REFUND LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JASON ALCARAZ, STEPHANIE WOOD, MICHELLE KOPFMANN and others
Defendant / Appellant:
STUBHUB, INC.
Defendant:
LAST MINUTE TRANSACTION, INC.
DAHL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv09837
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHNATHAN DAVID DAHL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dahl v. C.R. Bard, Inc.et al
as 2:2020cv03851
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., CR Bard and C.R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff:
David Dahl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anthony Brown Sr. v. Leah Tanner et al
as 2:2019cv02621
Defendant:
Leah Tanner, Brandon D. Fox, David Dahle and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Brown Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Gisel Del Real et al v. Leah Marks et al
as 2:2015cv09105
Defendant:
David Dahle, David Dahle, Jason Dalton and others
Plaintiff:
Gisel Del Real and Donovan Gonzalez
Dehuma v. Sisto et al
as 2:2009cv01230
Petitioner:
Juan Dehuma
Respondent:
Dennis Kris Sisto, John W Haviland, Sandra Bryson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dahl v. United States of America
as 4:2009cv00008
Petitioner:
Timothy David Dahl
Respondent:
United States of America and United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
