Cases 1 - 7 of 7
E.R.E. Ventures, LLC, et al v. David Evans and Associates, et al
as 22-55433
Plaintiff / Appellant:
E.R.E. VENTURES, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, E.R.E. LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and KANGARU ENTERPRISES, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, DBA Rusack Vineyards, DBA Santa Catalina Island Vineyards
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, an Oregon corporation, HALL AND FOREMAN, INC., a merged out California corporation and LANGAN ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENT SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
KOLOA PACIFIC CONSTRUCTION, INC., TERRAPACIFIC CONSULTANTS, INC. and CHRISTOPHERHILL DEVELOPMENT, INC.
E.R.E. Ventures, LLC et al v. David Evans and Associates et al
as 2:2017cv01561
Defendant:
David Evans and Associates, Hall and Foreman, Inc., Koloa Pacific Construction, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
E.R.E. LLC, E.R.E. Ventures, LLC and Kangaru Enterprises, LLC
TRI-STATE CONSTRUCTION, INC. et al v. David Evans and Associates, Inc.
as 2:2010cv01723
Plaintiff:
TRI-STATE CONSTRUCTION, INC. and BILFINGER/TRI-STATE JOINT VENTURE
Defendant:
David Evans and Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
David Evans and Associates, Inc. v. Bilfinger Berger Civil, Inc.
as 2:2010cv00956
Plaintiff:
David Evans and Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
Bilfinger Berger Civil, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Lhoir v. Food City et al
as 2:2009cv02534
Plaintiff:
Aaron Lhoir
Defendant:
Food City, Costco LLC, Arizona Title Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv01411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
United States of America v. Hooker Creek Asphalt and Paving, LLC et al
as 6:2008cv06307
Defendant:
Simeon Brubaker, Robert Bryant, Carter and Company, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Perry and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
