Cases 1 - 10 of 69
Michael-David Fleming v. Bank of England
as 26-1974
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL-DAVID FLEMING, Natural Man, In Propria Persona
Defendant:
BANK OF ENGLAND, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01932
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Fleming v. Lash
as 8:2026cv01544
Plaintiff:
Michael David Fleming
Defendant:
Richard A. Lash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
Fleming v. Lash
as 8:2026cv00957
Petitioner:
Michael David Fleming
Respondent:
Richard A. Lash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
Fleming v. Lash
as 8:2026cv00543
Plaintiff:
Michael David Fleming
Defendant:
Richard A. Lash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Fleming v. Collier County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2025cv01154
Plaintiff:
Michael-Zahir David Fleming
Defendant:
Collier County Sheriff's Office, Officer Tristan Allen, Officer Timothy Herrera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fleming v. Unknown
as 2:2025cv00881
Petitioner:
Michael-Zahir David Fleming
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Fleming v. Allen et al
as 2:2025cv00588
Plaintiff:
Michael-Zahir David Fleming
Defendant:
Officer Tristin Allen, Officer Timothy Herrera, Sergeant Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In re: Michael Fleming
as 25-11628
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL DAVID FLEMING
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA, COLLIER COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, TRISTIN ALLEN and others
Michael Fleming v. State of Florida, et al
as 25-11596
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DAVID FLEMING
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, COLLIER COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, TRISTIN ALLEN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
