Cases 1 - 10 of 12
McDonald v. Gast
as 1:2023cv01338
Petitioner:
Torlando Dontae McDonald
Respondent:
David Gast
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McDonald v. Gast
as 1:2022cv01424
Plaintiff:
Torlando Dontae McDonald
Defendant:
David Gast
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01421
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Hodge v. All American School Bus Corp. et al
as 1:2021cv01366
Defendant:
Benjamin Fishoff, Howard Belford, Martin Katz and others
Plaintiff:
Alexi Arias, Albert E. Percy, Percy Jobs and Careers Corporation an IRC 501(c)(3) non- profit, as Class Representative, and others
Respondent:
James M. Kernan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Kenneth Ashe v. J. Amburgey
as 19-6362
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH ASHE
Defendant / Appellee:
BCDC, J. THOMAS AMBURGEY, SHERIFF'S OFFICE and others
Edward Spiller v. David Gast, et al
as 18-1873
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD SPILLER
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID GAST, CHELSEA SMITH and JOHN P. VESPA
Spiller v. Gast et al
as 1:2018cv01124
Plaintiff:
Edward Spiller
Defendant:
David Gast, Chelsea Smith and John P Vespa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mark Wayne Ballard v. Marcellus Buchanan
as 16-6417
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK WAYNE BALLARD
Defendant - Appellee:
MARCELLUS M. BUCHANAN, DONALD DAVID GAST, AUSA Asheville, NC, MARTIN K. REIDINGER, US District Court Judge at Bryson City, NC and others
Matthew Dury v. Don Gast
as 13-7023
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW JAMES DURY
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD DAVID GAST and USA
Gast v. Kane County et al
as 1:2012cv03394
Defendant:
Kane County and Kane County Sheriff
Plaintiff:
David Gast
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
