Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Amaro Cisneros v. Peacock et al
as 1:2023cv00835
Plaintiff:
Tandy Amaro Cisneros
Defendant:
Denise Peacock, David Gilbert, Hillary Gurney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PASKO et al v. STATE OF INDIANA COUNTY OF VIGO et al
as 2:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
DAVID PASKO, LASHAWAN TOMPKINS, GRAYLON BELL and others
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA COUNTY OF VIGO, COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS OF VIGO COUNTY, BILL WATSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Gilbert v. Ligon et al
as 4:2019cv01294
Defendant:
Brett Ligon, Montgomery County Jail and Montgomery County Constable's Office Pct 4
Plaintiff:
David Gilbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rinaldo v. Elder et al
as 1:2017cv01582
Plaintiff:
Arick Justin Rinaldo
Defendant:
Bill Elder, David Gilbert, People of Colorado,The and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vaughns v. Gilbert et al
as 1:2015cv03999
Defendant:
City of New York and Detective David Gilbert
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Vaughns
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughns v. Gilbert et al
as 1:2015cv05112
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Vaughns
Defendant:
David Gilbert and City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Gilbert et al
as 1:2014cv00018
Plaintiff:
James B Allen
Defendant:
David Gilbert, Kyle Griffith, Benjamin McKnight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pettiford v. Marion Police Department et al
as 1:2013cv00320
Plaintiff:
Rudell L Pettiford
Defendant:
Marion Police Department, David Gilbert, Jay D Kay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Gilbert et al
as 1:2013cv00107
Plaintiff:
William H White, Jr
Defendant:
David Gilbert, Jay D Kay, Joseph Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dyson v. Gilbert et al
as 1:2013cv00023
Plaintiff:
Zar Dontay Dyson
Defendant:
David Gilbert, Andrew Renbarger, Rob Ricks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
