Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Tampico v. Meyer et al
as 4:2020cv02713
Defendant:
Paul Meyer, Unknown Alameda County District Attorney, Timothy Painter and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Tampico
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mo'i Kapu v. Attorney General of the State, et al
as 17-17310
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MO'I KAPU, AKA John Eleu Freeman Santos, AKA Jon Santos
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF HAWAII, Corporate STATE OF HAWAI'I ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE, Doug Chin, STATE OF HAWAII, Corporate State of Hawai'i, Sheriff Division, Nolan Espinda, BUREAU OF CONVEYANCES, State of Hawaii and others
Christopher Salem v. Alan Arakawa, et al
as 17-16721
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER SALEM
Defendant - Appellee:
ALAN ARAKAWA, individually and in his official capacity as MAYOR OF THE COUNTY OF MAUI, WILLIAM SPENCE, individually and in his official capacity as DIRECTOR OF PLANNING, COUNTY OF MAUI, PATRICK WONG, individually and in his official capacity as CORPORATION COUNSEL, THE COUNTY OF MAUI and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher Salem v. Alan Arakawa, et al
as 17-15309
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER SALEM
Defendant - Appellee:
ALAN ARAKAWA, individually and in his official capacity as MAYOR OF THE COUNTY OF MAUI, COUNTY OF MAUI, by and through THE DEPARTMENT OF THE CORPORATION COUNSEL, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING, AND THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE and others
Salem v. Arakawa
as 1:2015cv00384
Plaintiff:
Christopher Salem
Defendant:
Alan Arakawa , Roe Governmental Entities 1-20, Doe Partnerships 1-20 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
