Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Charles Getz, Jr. v. State of Delaware Board of Parole, et al
as 23-3014
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES R. GETZ, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF DELAWARE BOARD OF PAROLE, DAVID HENDERSON, JESSICA VOROUS and others
HENDERSON v. UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2023cv00341
Plaintiff:
DAVID HENDERSON
Defendant:
UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Getz v. State of Delaware Board of Parole et al
as 1:2022cv01536
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Getz, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Delaware Board of Parole, David Henderson, Jessica Vorous and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04609
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Smith v. May et al
as 1:2022cv00544
Petitioner:
Leroy L. Smith
Respondent:
Robert May, Kathleen Jennings and David Henderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brooks v. Henderson et al
as 1:2022cv00147
Plaintiff:
Alan T. Brooks
Defendant:
David Henderson, Jeffery Kays and Delaware Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HENDERSON v. TOWNSHIP OF HAMILTON et al
as 3:2019cv18656
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10, TOWNSHIP OF HAMILTON (MERCER COUNTY), HAMILTON TOWNSHIP REPUBLICAN COMMITTEE and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID HENDERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fenton v. Henderson
as 1:2019cv01692
Respondent:
David Henderson
Petitioner:
James R. Fenton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Charles Getz, Jr.
as 19-2036
Defendant:
BOARD OF PAROLE, LEEANN BULLOCK, JAMES F. JUSTICE and others
Not Yet Classified:
MARYELLEN NOREIKA and In re: CHARLES R. GETZ, JR.
Getz v. Board of Parole et al
as 1:2019cv00623
Defendant:
Jack Markell, Board of Parole, James F. Justice and others
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Getz, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
