Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 106
United States of America v. Lonich
as 24-1678
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: DAVID JOHN LONICH
United States of America v. Lonich
as 24-1673
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: DAVID JOHN LONICH
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv08776
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
United States of America v. Lonich, et al.
as 23-1178
Plaintiff / Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee: DAVID JOHN LONICH, BRIAN SCOTT MELLAND and SEAN CLARK CUTTING
David Thistle v. USDC-CASD
as 23-70074
Not Classified By Court: In re: DAVID JOHN THISTLE, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States and MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Petitioner: DAVID JOHN THISTLE
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO
David Thistle v. Joe Biden, et al
as 22-56167
Plaintiff / Appellant: DAVID JOHN THISTLE
Defendant / Appellee: JOE BIDEN, President of the United States and MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Rose Calvin, et al v. Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation
as 22-16713
Plaintiff / Appellee: ROSE CALVIN, SUSIE YELLOWMAN, JAMES JOHN and others
Defendant / Appellant: OFFICE OF NAVAJO AND HOPI INDIAN RELOCATION, an administrative agency of the United States
David Moses v. County of Marin, et al
as 22-16526
Plaintiff / Appellant: DAVID JOHN MOSES
Defendant / Appellee: COUNTY OF MARIN, SAN RAFAEL POLICE and CENTRAL MARIN POLICE AUTHORITY
David John v. L. McEwen
as 22-55889
Petitioner / Appellant: DAVID JOHN JOHN
Respondent / Appellee: L. S. MCEWEN, Warden
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv05021
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?