Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Johnston v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01719
Plaintiff:
David Johnston
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JOHNSTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv05980
Plaintiff:
JACK DAVID JOHNSTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnston v. Ford Motor Co., et al.
as 2:2023cv02034
Plaintiff:
David Johnston
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Heritage Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Johnston v. Ford Motor Co.
as 1:2023at00805
Plaintiff:
David Johnston
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-5202
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
O'Donnell v. Ephrata Police Department et al
as 5:2023cv01755
Plaintiff:
James Francis O'Donnell, Jr.
Defendant:
Ephrata Police Department, LANCASTER CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, Officer David Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
O'Donnell v. Ephrata Police Department et al
as 1:2023cv00740
Plaintiff:
James Francis O'Donnell, Jr.
Defendant:
Ephrata Police Department, Lancaster City Police Department, Officer David Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00613
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
JOHNSTON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv24267
Plaintiff:
DAVID JOHNSTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smeaton v. Nelson
as 21-30140
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, H. S. Ott, Warden Federal Detention Center Oakdale and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Keith Smeaton
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
