Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Midwest Alarm Company v. Pelican Electrical Group, Inc. et al
as 8:2023cv01877
Plaintiff:
Midwest Alarm Company
Defendant:
Pelican Electrical Group, Inc., David L. Williams and Irvene Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
WILLIAMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv19914
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID L WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILLIAMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv29532
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID L. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 3:2020cv00155
Plaintiff:
David L. Williams
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney General, The Congress, Laws of AEDPA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Saul
as 1:2019cv00412
Plaintiff:
David L. Williams
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Williams, Sr. v. East Baton Rouge Parish Prison et al
as 3:2018cv00148
Defendant:
Unknown Clement, East Baton Rouge Parish Prison, Unknown Grimes and others
Plaintiff:
David L. Williams, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Snohomish County Corrections et al
as 2:2017cv00656
Plaintiff:
David L Williams
Defendant:
Snohomish County Corrections, Snohomish County Superior Court and Snohomish County Public Defenders Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00566
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Default of Student Loan
WILLIAMS v. CHATMAN
as 6:2016cv00149
Petitioner:
DAVID L WILLIAMS
Respondent:
Robert Toole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WILLIAMS v. CHATMAN
as 1:2016cv00146
Petitioner:
DAVID L WILLIAMS
Respondent:
ROBERT TOOLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
