Cases 1 - 10 of 100
David Thomas v. Richard Porter
as 26-6800
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEON THOMAS
Defendant:
REPORTING OFFICER RICHARD PORTER, CHRISTOPHER ENGLES, Inmate, NASIR GEORGE, Inmate and others
Puckett v. Advanced Correctional Care et al
as 3:2026cv00991
Plaintiff:
David Leon Puckett
Defendant:
Advanced Correctional Care, Hughes Lochard, Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv61146
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00344
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv02130
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Terry v. Guzman et al
as 1:2026cv01000
Plaintiff:
David Leon Terry
Defendant:
Amaury Guzman and MDC Brooklyn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Puckett v. Ackley et al
as 3:2026cv00125
Plaintiff:
David Leon Puckett
Defendant:
Officer Ackley, Officer Jines, Officer Parris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Puckett v. Ackley et al
as 3:2026cv00095
Plaintiff:
David Leon Puckett
Defendant:
Officer Ackley, Officer Jines, Officer Parris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terry v. Guzman et al
as 1:2026cv00718
Plaintiff:
David Leon Terry
Defendant:
Amaury Guzman and MDC Brooklyn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maxwell v. Pacione, et al.
as 25-7795
Plaintiff:
SHAWN MAXWELL
Defendant:
LISA PACIONE, RAYMONDA MARQUEZ, CYNTHIA LOO, in their official and individual capacities and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
