Cases 11 - 20 of 171
Lippard v. Puskas et al
as 4:2023cv00209
Plaintiff:
David Lynn Lippard
Defendant:
David Puskas, Cherokee Nation Businesses, LLC and Cherokee CRC, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
GENTRY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv02644
Plaintiff:
DAVID LYNN GENTRY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Taft v. Blood et al
as 5:2022cv04066
Plaintiff:
David Lynn Taft, Jr
Defendant:
Aaron Blood, Clint Frederickson, Calvin Carver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Baker et al
as 1:2022cv00241
Plaintiff:
David Lynn Anderson
Defendant:
FNU Baker and FNU Sprouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McIntyre v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Polk)
as 8:2022cv01646
Petitioner:
David Lynn McIntyre
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BARCLAY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv06034
Plaintiff:
DAVID LYNN BARCLAY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETLY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Woods v. United States of America
as 5:2021cv00458
Plaintiff:
Mr. David Lynn Woods, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Woods v. United States of America
as 5:2021cv00459
Plaintiff:
Mr. David Lynn Woods, Jr. and David Woods, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
LUTHER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv58061
Plaintiff:
DAVID LYNN LUTHER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sydow v. Jefferson County Sheriffs Department et al
as 1:2021cv02642
Plaintiff:
Mrs. David Lynn Sydow and D Sydow
Defendant:
Jefferson County Sheriffs Department, Jeff Shrader, Jason Happ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
