Cases 11 - 20 of 491
Meyers v. Honeycutt et al
as 5:2023cv00184
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
R. Honeycutt, Amy Jenkins, Daniel Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Meyers v. Warden
as 23-7121
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN, of Red Onion State Prison, HAROLD W. CLARKE, VA DOC Director and KYLE ROSCH, VADOC Interstate Compact Administrator
Meyers v. Hedrick et al
as 5:2023cv00182
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Edward Hedrick, Alexander County Superior Court, Alexander County District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Meyers v. Postmaster General
as 23-7118
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
THE POSTMASTER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, CHIEF OF CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION UNIT, KRUSE and others
Meyers v. Honeycutt et al
as 5:2023cv00181
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
R. Honeycutt, Amy Jenkins, Daniel Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Meyers v. USA, et al
as 23-2990
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY and JUDGE CLAIRE C. CECCHI
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03015
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03014
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
David Meyers v. Dean Locklear
as 23-7057
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, ASSOCIATE WARDEN, TODD E. ISHEE, BRADESHAWN HARRIS, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR and others
Meyers v. Hoffman
as 5:2023cv00168
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Joseph Hoffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
