Cases 1 - 10 of 13
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv03055
Plaintiff:
DAVID MICHAEL SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20520
Plaintiff:
DAVID MICHAEL SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01039
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv96226
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES DAVID MICHAEL SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv34118
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID MICHAEL SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Wright et al
as 6:2014cv00723
Plaintiff:
David Michael Smith
Defendant:
Travis Wright , James Whitman and Rick Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. College of the Mainland et al
as 3:2013cv00307
Plaintiff:
David Michael Smith
Defendant:
College of the Mainland, Board of Trustees for College of the Mainland, Dr. Beth Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Carter et al v. Russell Stover Candies, Inc.
as 1:2013cv01552
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Carter , David Michael Smith , Linda Diane Bush and others
Defendant:
Russell Stover Candies, Inc.
Smith v. The College of the Mainland and Michael Elam, President of College, in His Individual and Official Capacity
as 3:2011cv00286
Plaintiff:
David Michael Smith
Defendant:
The College of the Mainland and Michael Elam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
