Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Phillips v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv02265
Plaintiff:
Herman Phillips
Defendant:
Governor William Lee, David Rausch, Frank Strada and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wooden v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv01052
Plaintiff:
John H. Wooden and Jabari I. Mandela
Defendant:
William Lee, David Raush, Frank Strada and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02315
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Watson v. Porter et al
as 3:2023cv00456
Plaintiff:
Deana Watson
Defendant:
Kenneth Porter, Otis Jenkins, Patrick Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garrett v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville et al
as 3:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
Paul Shane Garrett
Defendant:
Metropolitan Government of Nashville, Roy Dunaway, E. J. Bernard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
AWP, Inc. v. Safe Zone Services, LLC, et al
as 22-5373
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AWP, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
SAFE ZONE SERVICES, LLC, UNITED ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC., DANIEL WALSH and others
Miller v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2022cv01114
Plaintiff:
David Miller
Defendant:
CR Bard Incorporated and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv10537
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Miller v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2020cv03943
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Plaintiff:
David Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00525
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
David Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
