Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Mitchell v. Breitenbach et al
as 3:2023cv00388
Plaintiff:
David Mitchell
Defendant:
Nethanjah Breitenbach, James Dzurenda, Dr. Naughton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Breitenbach et al
as 3:2023cv00195
Plaintiff:
David Mitchell
Defendant:
Nethanjah Breitenbach, Charles Daniels, James Dzurenda and others
Interested Party:
Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McFarland v. USA
as 6:2016cv01179
Petitioner:
David Mitchell McFarland
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
McFarland v. USA
as 6:2016cv01178
Petitioner:
David Mitchell McFarland
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
McFarland v. USA
as 6:2016cv01177
Petitioner:
David Mitchell McFarland
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
McFarland v. USA
as 6:2016cv01180
Petitioner:
David Mitchell McFarland
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
McFarland v. USA
as 6:2015cv02357
Petitioner:
David Mitchell McFarland
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Mitchell # 102437 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2014cv02063
Plaintiff:
Jamal David Mitchell, Sr.
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Arizona Department of Corrections and Unknown Pruitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Lower-Broderson et al
as 3:2011cv00524
Plaintiff:
David Mitchell
Defendant:
Lower-Broderson, Cruz and V. Orozco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Schriro et al
as 2:2008cv01463
Petitioner:
David Mitchell
Respondent:
Dora Schriro and Arizona Attorney General, State of
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
