Cases 71 - 80 of 434
Staley v. Pritzker et al
as 3:2022cv02028
Plaintiff:
David James Staley
Defendant:
J B Pritzker, Rob Jeffreys, Jeffrey M. Dennison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Myers et al
as 3:2022cv02175
Plaintiff:
Jared Michael Smith
Defendant:
Percy Myers, Christine Brown, David Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2022cv02193
Plaintiff:
Learnell L. Brown
Defendant:
David Mitchell, Tarry Williams and Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2022cv50295
Plaintiff:
Learnell L. Brown
Defendant:
David Mitchell, Tarry Williams and Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barney Dunlap v. David Mitchell
as 22-6967
Petitioner / Appellant:
BARNEY ADRIAN DUNLAP
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID MITCHELL, Superintendent, Lanesboro Correctional Institution
Wheeler v. Mitchelle et al
as 3:2022cv01624
Plaintiff:
David Wheeler
Defendant:
David Mitchelle, Christel Crow, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tywilla Meadors et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv05031
Plaintiff:
Tywilla Meadors, Timothy Medrano, Linda Meiborg and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
MITCHELL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14198
Plaintiff:
JOSIAH DAVID MITCHELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Akins v. Mitchell et al
as 1:2022cv03349
Petitioner:
Francisco Akins
Respondent:
David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lamon v. Mitchell
as 1:2022cv01212
Petitioner:
Andrew Lamon
Respondent:
David Mitchell
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
