Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Feds for Medical Freedom v. Antony Blinken
as 24-1079
Plaintiff:
FEDS FOR MEDICAL FREEDOM, MARIE BALLERINI-HOUGNON, DONALD CARROLL and others
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of State, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, CAROL PEREZ, in her official capacity as Director General of the Foreign Service and Director of Global Talent Bureau in the Bureau of Global Talent Management at the the U.S. Department of State and others
Feds for Medical Freedom v. Blinken et al
as 1:2023cv00266
Plaintiff:
Feds for Medical Freedom, Marie Ballerini-Hougnon, Donald Carroll and others
Defendant:
Anthony J. Blinken, Department of State, Carol Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv01732
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00750
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Pemberton et al v. Chubbs Lloyds Insurance Company of Texas et al
as 3:2012cv04514
Plaintiff:
David Pemberton and Laurie Pemberton
Defendant:
Chubb Lloyds Insurance Company of Texas and Walter Haessig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Pemberton v. Muse et al
as 3:2012cv03240
Plaintiff:
David Pemberton
Defendant:
John Muse , Muse Pemberton LLC , HM Capital Partners LLC and others
Counter_claimant:
John Muse
Counter_defendant:
David Pemberton
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Phoneternet, LLC, d/b/a Maestro v. InTouch Solutions, LLC et al
as 3:2009cv00714
Plaintiff:
Phoneternet, LLC, d/b/a Maestro
Defendant:
InTouch Solutions, LLC, InTouch Solutions, LLC, First Marketing Group of Tampa, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
