Cases 21 - 30 of 70
Burgess v. Reddix et al
as 3:2013cv01006
Plaintiff:
Mark Burgess
Defendant:
Michael Reddix , Carl Faulks , David Petrie and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Winding v. MTC, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv00032
Plaintiff:
James Winding
Defendant:
MTC, Inc., H. Hollie, T. Naylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. Ruffin et al
as 4:2013cv00034
Plaintiff:
James Winding
Defendant:
B. Ruffin, F. Warden, F. Ovalle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. Hollie et al
as 4:2013cv00030
Plaintiff:
James Winding
Defendant:
H. Hollie, T. Naylor, M. Powe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. U.S. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2013cv00017
Plaintiff:
Mark J. Allen
Defendant:
U.S. Federal Bureau of Prisons, Corrections Corporation of America (C.C.A), Mississippi Department of Corrections (MDOC) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. Harbin et al
as 4:2013cv00026
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
A. Harbin, C. Dykes, F. Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. Harbin et al
as 4:2013cv00014
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
A. Harbin, C. Dykes, F. Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. Sparkman et al
as 1:2012cv00226
Plaintiff:
Jairie T. Pierce, Jr.
Defendant:
Emmitt Sparkman, Mississippi Department of Corrections, Christopher Epps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tommy White, Sr. v. Christopher Epps, et al
as 12-60662
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TOMMY WHITE, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS, Commisioner, MARGARET BINGHAM, BRIAN LADNER and others
Bradley v. Woodall et al
as 2:2012cv00134
Plaintiff:
Reginald DeShawn Bradley
Defendant:
Ronald Woodall, Ronald King, Beth Hillman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
