Cases 1 - 8 of 8
The Estate of Paul Browning, et al. v. City of Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, et al.
as 24-2034
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF PAUL BROWNING and BETTY BROWNING
Defendant:
CITY OF LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, GREG JOLLEY, MICHAEL BUNKER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Radcliff et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv12672
Plaintiff:
David Radcliff and Nancy Mcmanus
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
David Radcliff v. San Diego Gas & Electric Company, et al
as 22-55940
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID RADCLIFF, invidually and on behalf of others similarly situated and aggrieved
Defendant / Appellee:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY, a California corporation, SEMPRA ENERGY, a California corporation and DOES, 1 through 50, inclusive
RADCLIFF v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv01709
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID RADCLIFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Radcliff v. San Diego Gas & Electric Company et al
as 3:2020cv01555
Defendant:
Sempra Energy, -, DOES 1 through 50 and San Diego Gas & Electric Company
Plaintiff:
David Radcliff
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0185
Browning v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al
as 2:2020cv01381
Defendant:
Greg Jolley, H Oren, Thornton and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Lewis Browning
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Radcliffe et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv11528
Plaintiff:
Delia Radcliffe and David Radcliffe
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
