Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Matthews v. Rice et al
as 5:2011cv03221
Plaintiff:
Gary Matthews
Defendant:
Elizabeth Rice, Ray Roberts, Sam Cline and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Riggins v. Dan Pacholke, et al
as 11-35609
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID RIGGINS, AKA Dawud Halisi Malik
Defendant - Appellee:
DAN PACHOLKE, TAMMY GWIN, C WHALEY, I&I and others
Adkins v. Sapien, et al
as 11-3131
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EBRAHIM ADKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT SAPIEN, Unit Team Manager, El Dorado Correctional Facility, in his dual capacity, PAUL SNYDER, Unit Team Manager, El Dorado Correctional Facility, in his dual capacity, DON STURGILL, Unit Team Counselor, El Dorado Correctional Facility, in his dual capacity and others
Adkins v. Sapien et al
as 5:2010cv03170
Plaintiff:
Ebrahim Adkins
Defendant:
Robert Sapien, Paul Snyder, Don Sturgill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stallings v. Werholtz et al
as 5:2010cv03119
Plaintiff:
Darrell Lamont Stallings
Defendant:
Roger Werholtz, Marcelle Cappel-Schmidling, Stuart A. Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Riggins v. Harold Clarke, et al
as 09-35467
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID RIGGINS, aka Dawud Halisi Malik, AKA Dawud Halisi Malik
Defendant - Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE, DOC Secretary, RON VAN BOENING, Superintendent MICC, HOUSTON WIMBERLY, Counselor, MICC and others
Ash-Shahid v. Werholtz et al
as 0:2008cv06412
Plaintiff:
Wahid Ash-Shahid
Defendant:
Roger Werholtz, Jeff Smith, David Riggin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Riggin et al
as 5:2008cv03154
Plaintiff:
Robert J Anderson
Defendant:
David Riggin, Sam Cline and (fnu) Marcus
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Malik v. Clarke et al
as 3:2007cv05160
Plaintiff:
David Riggins
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Ron Van Boening, Houston Wimberly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
