Cases 41 - 50 of 63
Irving Hage, et al v. Xanodyne Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
as 13-80033
Plaintiff - Respondent:
IRVING HAGE, an individual, OLIVER AGUAYO, an individual, HELEN ARCHIBOLD, an individual and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
XANODYNE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Riley v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 4:2012cv00603
Plaintiff:
David Riley
Defendant:
Bank of America NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reed, Jr. v. Michaud, et al
as 12-1292
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NORMAN RAY REED, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID MICHAUD, in his professional and individual capacity, JOHN SUTHERS, in his professional and individual capacity, MICHAEL ANDERSON, in his professional and individual capacity and others
Sipling v. Reddish et al
as 3:2012cv00330
Plaintiff:
David Riley Sipling
Defendant:
B.W. Reddish and N Jeffcoat
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00474
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. Colorado Board of Parole et al
as 1:2012cv00068
Plaintiff:
Norman Ray Reed, Jr.
Defendant:
Colorado Board of Parole, John Suthers, John (I) Suthers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dames et al v. City of New York
as 1:2011cv05953
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Grace A. Perkins, Chantel D. Hall, jeanette l. dawson and others
Plaintiff:
Farris Coley, David Riley, Mohd Hamid and others
Defendant:
City of New York
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
Riley v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America et al
as 1:2010cv01765
Plaintiff:
David Riley
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America and Inverness Medical Innovations, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
