Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01415
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00976
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Ferguson v. Saul
as 2:2020cv00066
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
David S. Ferguson
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Johnson et al v. United States et al
as 4:2019cv02328
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L.G. Johnson and Joseph Johnson
Defendant:
United States Court of Appeals Federal Circuit, Central Intelligence Agency, United States Senate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. United States et al
as 4:2019cv01694
Defendant:
Allan D. Lourie, United States Court of Appeals Federal Circuit, Central Intelligence Agency and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Johnson and Jeffrey L.G. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00459
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Jennings et al v. Annett Holdings, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv00821
Plaintiff:
Deborah Jennings and Allen Jennings
Defendant:
Annett Holdings, Inc. and David S Pierce
Counter_claimant:
Annett Holdings, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Allen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daniel v. Colvin
as 4:2016cv00268
Plaintiff:
David S Daniel
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Zink v. Griffith et al
as 4:2015cv00862
Petitioner:
David S Zink
Respondent:
Cindy Griffith , Troy Steele , David Dormire and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
