Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Bates v. Saul
as 1:2021cv00719
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Plaintiff: David Scott Bates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hamlin v. Garman et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00336
Petitioner: David Scott Hamlin
Respondent: Pennsylvania Attorney General Office and Mark Garman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FORTNEY
as 2:2019mc00212
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00112
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Type: Bankruptcy Appeal
SCOTT v. KERRY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv05983
Plaintiff: DAVID SCOTT
Defendant: JOHN F. KERRY , JOHN DOE, JANE ROE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Scott v. Verizon Wireless Personal Communications, L.P.
as 3:2014cv00782
Plaintiff: David Scott
Defendant: Verizon Wireless Personal Communications, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 332
SCOTT v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv00751
Plaintiff: DAVID SCOTT
Defendant: CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv06988
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY v. ABRAMS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv01567
Defendant: THEODORE MONGELL, DAVID SCOTT, WERNER ENTERPRISES and others
Plaintiff: THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY
3Rd Party Defendant: HALLMARK INSURANCE CO.
Special Master: THOMAS T. FRAMPTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Type: Contract Insurance
Sims v. Beard et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv00004
Petitioner: David Scott Sims
Respondent: Jeffrey A Beard, PA State Attorney General and District Attorney of York County, Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?