Cases 1 - 9 of 9
HAMMOND et al v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00922
Plaintiff:
KHALIL HAMMOND, DAVID THOMPSON, ANTOINE WALKER and others
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LAUREL HARRY, GEORGE LITTLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2023cv00766
Plaintiff:
LEROY THOMPSON, JR.
Defendant:
OLIVER DAVID THOMPSON and EDWARD P. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
ALDERMAN HOLDINGS, LLC v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2023cv00757
Plaintiff:
ALDERMAN HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
OLIVER DAVID THOMPSON and EDWARD P. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
THOMPSON v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION (CONRAIL)
as 2:2017cv03300
Plaintiff:
DAVID THOMPSON
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION (CONRAIL)
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 20109
THOMPSON v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2014cv00191
Plaintiff:
DAVID THOMPSON
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and M. FARRELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. WYNNEWOOD OF LOWER MERION TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2012cv02308
Plaintiff:
DAVID THOMPSON
Defendant:
WYNNEWOOD OF LOWER MERION TOWNSHIP , LOWER MERION POLICE DEPARTMENT , COLETTA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
THOMPSON v. GOVERNOR OF STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2010cv00570
Plaintiff:
DAVID THOMPSON
Defendant:
GOVERNOR OF STATE OF NEW JERSEY, SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, FAMILY PART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. KERESTES et al
as 2:2009cv00631
Petitioner:
DAVID THOMPSON
Respondent:
JOHN KERESTES, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
