Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Gibson v. Hanna
as 23-10003
Petitioner / Appellant:
Scottie H. Gibson
Respondent / Appellee:
Dale S. Hanna, District Attorney and David Vernon, Assistant District Attorney
Gibson v. Hanna
as 22-10994
Petitioner / Appellant:
Scottie H. Gibson
Respondent / Appellee:
Dale S. Hanna, District Attorney and David Vernon, Assistant District Attorney
Vernon-Hunt v. Guzman
as 1:2022cv05181
Petitioner:
James David Vernon-Hunt
Respondent:
Carlos Guzman
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Gibson v. Hanna et al
as 3:2022cv00992
Petitioner:
Scottie H Gibson
Respondent:
Dale S Hanna and David Vernon
Not Classified By Court:
ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gillaspie v. Ward et al
as 3:2019cv01809
Defendant:
David Vernon, Terry Brown, Robert Ward and others
Plaintiff:
Zachary Don Gillaspie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Boites v. Salazar et al
as 5:2019cv00476
Defendant:
All District Court Judges of Bexar County, TX, Bexar County Public Defender's Office, All Bexar County Adult Detention Officers and others
Plaintiff:
Rigoberto Herrera Boites, Noe Rolando Ibarra, David Robles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gillaspie v. Ward et al
as 3:2019cv00895
Respondent:
David Vernon, Lisa Powell, City of Alvarado and others
Petitioner:
Zachary Don Gillaspie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BRAY v. LAUGHLIN
as 3:2015cv00065
Petitioner:
DAVID VERNON BRAY, JR
Respondent:
V. LAUGHLIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Estate of Elaine Purcell, et al v. Arturo Arauzo, et al
as 15-10500
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ESTATE OF ELAINE PURCELL, through Parker Waggaman as Personal Representative and PARKER WAGGAMAN, individually
Defendant - Appellee:
ARTURO ARAUZO, ARTURO ARAUZO, d.b.a. Arturo Arauzo, M.D., USA DRUG MART, INC. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv01732
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
