Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Sweetin v. State Farm Lloyds
as 4:2023cv00573
Plaintiff:
Warden of Unit David W. Sweetin
Defendant:
STATE FARM LLOYDS
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Hezron Stuart-El v. Steven Miller, et al
as 13-20401
Petitioner - Appellant:
HEZRON STUART-EL
Respondent - Appellee:
STEVEN T. MILLER, Warden, CHRISTOPHER CARTER, Assistant Warden, YUSEF L. MCCREE, Lieutenant and others
King v. Thaler et al
as 4:2012cv03468
Plaintiff:
Vernon King, Jr
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, James H. Kent, Byron Hancock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stuart-El v. Miller et al
as 4:2012cv02216
Plaintiff:
Hezron Stuart-El
Defendant:
Steven T. Miller, Christopher Carter, Yusef L. McCree and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stuart-El v. Miller, et al.
as 4:2012cv01819
Petitioner:
Hezron Stuart-El
Defendant:
Steven T Miller, Christopher Carter, Yusef L. McCree and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
King Jr. v. Gunniels et al
as 4:2012cv00814
Plaintiff:
Vernon King Jr.
Defendant:
Richard Gunniels, Monica M Nichele, Christopher Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Balcerowicz v. Estelle Unit TDCJ et al
as 4:2012cv00310
Plaintiff:
Larry Balcerowicz , Jr
Defendant:
Estelle Unit TDCJ, UTMB/TDCJ Medical Dept Galveston, TX, Texas Dept. Criminal Justice Division and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cudjo v. Harrison et al
as 4:2011cv04382
Plaintiff:
Jimmie L. Cudjo
Defendant:
Lisa Harrison, Rayshawn D. Nixon, David W Sweetin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hidrogo v. Sweetin et al
as 4:2011cv02527
Plaintiff:
Arnold Hidrogo
Defendant:
David W. Sweetin, Christopher G. Carter and Warren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prude vs Sweetin et al
as 9:2009cv00098
Petitioner:
Brian Briture Prude
Respondent:
David W Sweetin, Gregory H Oliver, Blake Lamb and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
