Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Robertson #163724 v. Unknown Parties
as 2:2023cv00155
Petitioner:
David William Robertson
Respondent:
Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robertson #163724 v. Unknown Parties
as 2:2023cv00156
Petitioner:
David William Robertson
Respondent:
Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Killeen et al v. Yavapai, County of et al
as 3:2020cv08119
Defendant:
David Williams and Yavapai, County of
Plaintiff:
Joshua Killeen, Emily Killeen and Ananda Retreat LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hasbrouck et al v. Yavapai, County of et al
as 3:2020cv08112
Defendant:
David Williams, Carlton Woodruff, Larry Jacobs and others
Plaintiff:
Donna M Hasbrouck and Earl M Hasbrouck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sandhoff #094839 v. Shinn et al
as 3:2020cv08058
Petitioner:
David William Sandhoff
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams et al v. Home Depot USA Incorporated et al
as 3:2019cv08328
Plaintiff:
David Williams and Cyndi Williams
Defendant:
Unknown Parties and Home Depot USA Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Flahive #151936 v. Corizon Health Services et al
as 2:2019cv04834
Defendant:
Nicole Johnson, Lawrence Ende, Angela White and others
Plaintiff:
David William Flahive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Niedermeyer v. Mascher et al
as 3:2017cv08056
Plaintiff:
Jason Douglas Niedermeyer
Defendant:
Scott Mascher, Stephen Edgar, Daphne Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodard v. United States Attorney's Office et al
as 2:2015cv00595
Plaintiff:
Willie Gene Woodard
Defendant:
United States Attorney's Office, Kevin Rapp, Monica Klapper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perkins v. Colvin
as 3:2013cv08230
Plaintiff:
David William Perkins
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
