Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Moore v. Merrick Bank et al
as 3:2023cv02667
Plaintiff:
Randy R Moore
Defendant:
Merrick Bank and David Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Yang v. Nobilis Health
as 22-20224
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Zhang Yang
Defendant / Appellee:
Nobilis Health Corporation, Harry Fleming, David Young and others
Zhang Yang v. Nobilis Health Corp., et al
as 20-20538
Defendant / Appellee:
David Young, Harry Fleming, Nobilis Health Corporation and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Zhang Yang
Servance v. Griffis Et Al
as 7:2019cv00042
Plaintiff:
Andrew Servance
Defendant:
David Young, Amanda Bivins and Mike Griffis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yang v. Nobilis Health Corp. et al
as 4:2019cv00145
Defendant:
David Young, Kenneth J Klein, Nobilis Health Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Zhang Yang
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Van 'T Hoofd v. Nobilis Health Corp. et al
as 4:2018cv04727
Defendant:
David Young, Nobilis Health Corp., Kenneth J. Klein and others
Plaintiff:
Leo Van 'T Hoofd
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Young v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2015cv05912
Plaintiff:
David Young
Defendant:
Janssen Ortho LLC, Johnson & Johnson Company, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Young et al v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc
as 6:2014cv02591
Plaintiff:
David Young and Sarah Young
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc , Takeda Development Center Americas Inc , Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Young V. Allstate Insurance Company
as 2:2014cv01699
Plaintiff:
David Young
Defendant:
Allstate Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
