Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Harco National Insurance Company v. Horizon Shine Hauling, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
Harco National Insurance Company
Defendant:
Horizon Shine Hauling, LLC, Giorgi Logistics, LLC, M&G Carriers, LLC and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Alexander, Winton & Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Jones v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02062
Plaintiff:
Bradly Davis Jones
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Jones-Battle v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 2:2017cv05509
Plaintiff:
Merrill Davis Jones-Battle
Defendant:
Sanofi S.A., Aventis Pharma S.A., Sanofi US Services Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as 6:2012cv02918
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals L L C, Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Davis Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Davis-Jones et al v. Crider et al
as 1:2010cv00018
Plaintiff:
Sharon M. Davis-Jones, Jeffrey L. Burnett, Manley W. Crider and others
Defendant:
Michael J. Levenson, Michael J. Levenson, Lee P. Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Jones v. State of Texas, et al
as 07-50978
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLEMENT DAVIS JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF TEXAS, SUSAN REED, Chief District Attorney, Bexar County, RALPH LOPEZ, Sheriff, of Bexar County and others
Sampson v. Jones et al
as 3:2007cv00512
Plaintiff:
Jackie R. Sampson
Defendant:
Donald Jones, Chad Butler, Tom Milam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. State of Texas et al
as 5:2007cv00539
Plaintiff:
Clement Davis Jones
Defendant:
State of Texas, Susan Reed, Ralph Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
