Cases 1 - 10 of 22
HOSPITALITY INSURANCE COMPANY v. SAM 939 LLC et al
as 2:2025cv06582
Plaintiff:
HOSPITALITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
SAM 939 LLC doing business as MAXI'S, SAMUEL ARBITMAN, DEANDRE HOPSON and others
Cross-Plaintiff:
SAM 939 LLC and SAMUEL ARBITMAN
Cross-Defendant:
A. ROBERT SARACINO and JOHN P. MEEHAN AGENCY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Misappropriation of Trade Secrets
HOPSON v. RAINEY et al
as 4:2013cv00084
Defendant:
BENNY BERRY, COMMONWEALTH'S ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and others
Plaintiff:
DEANDRE HOPSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DeAndre Hopson v. Ruth Spencer, et al
as 13-5571
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEANDRE HOPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
RUTH SPENCER, COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
HOPSON v. BERRY et al
as 4:2013cv00045
Defendant:
BENNY BERRY, CHARLIE CUNNINGHAM, DENETRA GATES and others
Plaintiff:
DEANDRE HOPSON
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
HOPSON v. SPENCER et al
as 4:2013cv00026
Defendant:
BENNY BERRY, GARY HUFFMAN and RUTH SPENCER
Plaintiff:
DEANDRE HOPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hopson v. Cunningham et al
as 3:2013cv00226
Plaintiff:
DeAndre Hopson
Defendant:
Charlie Cunningham, CPS Louisville, Judge Gerber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hopson v. Louisville Metro Police et al
as 3:2013cv00188
Plaintiff:
DeAndre Hopson
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Police, Ruth Spencer, CPS Social Worker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hopson v. Spencer et al
as 3:2013cv00080
Plaintiff:
DeAndre Hopson
Defendant:
Ruth Ann Spencer, Judge Collins, Susan Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HOPSON v. SPENCER
as 4:2013cv00009
Plaintiff:
DEANDRE HOPSON
Defendant:
RUTH SPENCER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
