Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 134
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00315
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Johnson v. Sony Pictures Inc.
as 3:2024cv00247
Plaintiff: Deangelo Johnson
Defendant: Sony Pictures Inc. doing business as Crunchyroll
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00125
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
US v. Deangelo Joyner
as 24-4036
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: DEANGELO MAURICE JOYNER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00037
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
US v. Braxton Benton
as 24-4015
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: BRAXTON DEANGELO BENTON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00833
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00552
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gary Maddox, Jr. v. The Parole Commission of Maryland and its Agents
as 23-6632
Plaintiff / Appellant: GARY EUGENE MADDOX, JR.
Defendant / Appellee: THE PAROLE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND AND ITS AGENTS, DAVID R. BLUMBERG, Chairman, DEANGELO PATTERSON, Agent and others
Toomer v. Tolson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv02320
Plaintiff: DeAngelo Shamond Toomer
Defendant: Kevin R Tolson, John Hicks and Rodney Hope
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?