Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Heyliger v. New York State Police Department et al
as 3:2011cv01293
Plaintiff:
Derek A. Heyliger
Defendant:
New York State Police Department, New York State Department of Corrections Community Supervision, City of Binghamton Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. McGlynn (Stephens)
as 10-2056
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kyle McGlynn
Defendant - Appellant:
DeAngelo Stephens
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-1345
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Green v. Selsky
as 10-944
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Shawn Green
Defendant - Appellee:
Donald Selsky, former Director, Special Housing/Inmate Disciplinary Program, James Conway, Superintendent Attica Correctional Facility, Captain DeAngelo and others
Deangelo et al v. PRRC Inc
as 3:2009cv01753
Plaintiff:
Charlene Deangelo, Patricia Frasca and Kai Fasset
Defendant:
PRRC Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Green v. Selsky et al
as 6:2009cv06392
Plaintiff:
Shawn Green
Defendant:
Donald Selsky, James Conway, DeAngelo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. The East Meadow Union Free School District et al
as 2:2008cv04216
Plaintiff:
Mary Russell
Defendant:
The East Meadow Union Free School District, Leon Campo, Louis DeAngelo and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Stephens v. USA
as 5:2008cv00882
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
DeAngelo Stephens
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Stephens v. USA
as 5:2008cv00871
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
DeAngelo Stephens
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
