Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Bottesi #855523 v. Kingsford, City of et al
as 2:2015cv00075
Plaintiff:
William J. Bottesi #855523, Jr.
Defendant:
Shawn Degroot and Brandon Rutter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Naseer, Hakim v. Kiler et al
as 3:2014cv00496
Plaintiff:
Hakim Naseer
Defendant:
Kiler , Watermolen, Potts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryan Ransom v. D. Ortiz, et al
as 12-17492
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRYAN EDWIN RANSOM
Defendant - Appellee:
D. ORTIZ, Associate Warden of CSP-Corcoran, A. CANTON, Director's Level Appeals Examiner at CDCR Headquarters, P. FLORES, Correctional Sergeant at Substance Abuse Treatment Facility and others
Bryan Ransom v. D. Ortiz, et al
as 11-16970
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRYAN EDWIN RANSOM
Defendant - Appellee:
D. ORTIZ, A. CANTON, P. FLORES and others
Bryan Ransom v. M. Johnson, et al
as 11-16157
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRYAN EDWIN RANSOM
Defendant - Appellee:
M. JOHNSON, G. LILLY, B. ESPINOZA and others
Ransom v. Ortiz et al
as 1:2011cv00617
Plaintiff:
Bryan E. Ransom
Defendant:
D. Ortiz, A. Canton, P. Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LAWRENCE v. DEGROOT et al
as 2:2011cv01372
Plaintiff:
TYRONE LAWRENCE
Defendant:
PAUL DEGROOT, GREGORY J. APRILE, ESQ. and ERNEST M. CAPOSELA J.S.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The Estate of Jessie Miller et al v. Michlowski, Thomas et al
as 3:2010cv00807
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Jessie Miller , James Wesley Stewart and Nakita Marie Falkenstein
Defendant:
Thomas J. Michlowski , Ryan Tobiasz , Sally Farley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryan Ransom v. M. Johnson, et al
as 10-17591
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRYAN EDWIN RANSOM
Defendant - Appellee:
M. JOHNSON, P. FLORES, D. ADAMS and others
Williams v. Owens et al
as 1:2010cv02477
Plaintiff:
Randall Williams
Defendant:
Brian Owens , James Degroot , Timothy C. Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
