Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Kevin M. DeHoog v. Comptons Sheriffs Dep. Train Div.
as 8:2024cv00744
Plaintiff:
Kevin M. DeHoog
Defendant:
Comptons Sheriffs Dep. Train Div.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin M. DeHoog v. Compton Sheriffs Train Division Body Cameras
as 8:2024cv00637
Plaintiff:
Kevin M DeHoog
Defendant:
Compton Sheriffs Train Division Body Cameras
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin M. DeHoog v. Theo Lacy
as 8:2024cv00638
Plaintiff:
Kevin M DeHoog
Defendant:
Theo Lacy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin M. DeHoog v. Theo Lacy Masked Guards
as 8:2024cv00586
Plaintiff:
Kevin M DeHoog
Defendant:
Theo Lacy Masked Guards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin Michael DeHoog v. Private Quinzler Deputy et al
as 8:2024cv00558
Plaintiff:
Kevin M DeHoog
Defendant:
Private Quinzler Deputy, Private Hernandez Deputy, Private Gonzalez Deputy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin M DeHoog v. Compton Sheriffs Train Div
as 8:2024cv00473
Petitioner:
Kevin M DeHoog
Respondent:
Compton Sheriffs Train Div
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Tolley v. Morrow et al
as 1:2024cv01039
Plaintiff:
Eric Jason Tolley
Defendant:
Morrow, Monroe Dodson, DeHoog and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeHoog v. Kijakazi
as 5:2022cv03850
Plaintiff:
Karen Michelle DeHoog
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
DeHoog et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 3:2019cv00811
Plaintiff:
Scott DeHoog and Jennifer DeHoog
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl
Nettleton v. Brady et al
as 6:2018cv00385
Defendant:
A Micheal Adler, Beth M. Bagley, Alta J. Brady and others
Plaintiff:
Sharon Nettleton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
