Cases 41 - 50 of 55
Gutierrez v. Dejesus
as 1:2013cv00236
Plaintiff:
Victor Gutierrez
Defendant:
Caesar B Dejesus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Abernathy et al v. Chicago
as 1:2012cv00870
Plaintiff:
Tony Abernathy , Phillip Adams , Juan Ahedo and others
Defendant:
City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwin DeJesus v. Unknown
as 11-1964
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWIN DEJESUS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNKNOWN, sued as "all medical staff, Waukesha County Jail, Nurses, Doctors"
DeJesus v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 3:2010cv13008
Defendant:
Kim R. DeJesus , Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DeJesus v. Giese et al
as 2:2010cv00831
Plaintiff:
Edwin DeJesus
Defendant:
Michael D Giese, Captain Greenwald, CO Hartung and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeJesus v. Advance Electrical Supply Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv01122
Plaintiff:
Mayra DeJesus
Defendant:
Advance Electrical Supply Co., Inc. and United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Chavez et al v. Don Stoltzner Mason Contractor, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00264
Defendant:
Don Stoltzner Mason Contractor, Inc., Don Stoltzner Mason Contractor, Inc., William J Asta and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Manuel Chavez, Felipe Dejesus Pulido, Miguel Pulido and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
DeJesus v. Giese et al
as 2:2010cv00012
Defendant:
Michael Giese and Unknown
Plaintiff:
Edwin Dejesus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Jose Santos-Gomez
as 09-3734
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE DEJESUS SANTOS-GOMEZ, also known as MOISES RUIZ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv05005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
