Cases 61 - 70 of 144
Hayden v. Stevenson et al
as 3:2020cv50424
Defendant:
Two Unknown Male DeKalb County Sheriff's Deputies, County of DeKalb Illinois, Two Unknown Female DeKalb County Sheriff's Deputies and others
Plaintiff:
Sean Hayden, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wingfield v. Mann et al
as 1:2020cv02136
Defendant:
Jeffrey Mann, Michael L. Thurmond, Melody M. Maddox and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Bernard Wingfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00089
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Silva v. Read
as 3:2020cv50007
Defendant:
DeKalb County Sheriff, Read, Roger Scott and others
Plaintiff:
Roberto Silva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03268
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Boseman v. Mann et al
as 1:2019cv02835
Plaintiff:
Zachary William Boseman
Defendant:
Jeffery Mann, DeKalb County Sheriff's Office and DeKalb County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Shuler et al
as 1:2019cv02078
Defendant:
Robert James, The District Attorney Office of Dekalb County, The Dekalb County Sheriff & Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan L. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Sheriff Jeffrey L. Mann, Esq.
as 1:2019cv00634
Defendant:
Sheriff Jeffrey L. Mann, Esq., DeKalb County and DeKalb County Sheriff's Office
Plaintiff:
Derrick Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGill v. Brouwer et al
as 3:2018cv50387
Defendant:
Doug Brouwer, DeKalb County Sheriff's Dept. and DeKalb County
Plaintiff:
Marcus McGill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. DeKalb County Sheriff et al
as 1:2018cv00387
Plaintiff:
Thomas J Clark and Thomas Clark
Defendant:
DeKALB COUNTY SHERIFF DONALD LAUER, T. McCormick, T. Olinske and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
