Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
DEACONESS HOSPITAL INC. et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2022cv03136
Plaintiff:
DEACONESS HOSPITAL INC., NORTHERN HOSPITAL DISTRICT OF SURRY COUNTY doing business as NORTHERN REGIONAL HOSPITAL, CORNING HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
JOHNSON v. HARPER et al
as 3:2019cv00262
Defendant:
BOONVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, DEACONESS HOSPITAL, INC., CITY OF BOONVILLE and others
Plaintiff:
LINDANN JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00224
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
MOORE et al v. DEACONESS HOSPITAL, INC.
as 3:2018cv00134
Defendant:
DEACONESS GATEWAY HOSPITAL and DEACONESS HOSPITAL, INC.
Plaintiff:
AMANDA MOORE, AERABELLA WHITFIELD and BRADEN WHITFIELD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
Borum v. Smith et al
as 4:2017cv00017
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Gay Borum
Defendant:
Jung Wook Kang Smith , Deaconess Clinic, Inc. , Deaconess Hospital, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
GRIFFIN v. DEACONESS HOSPITAL, INC. et al
as 3:2016cv00032
Defendant:
DEACONESS HOSPITAL, INC. and WELBORN HEALTH PLANS, INC.
Plaintiff:
KRISTOFFER R. GRIFFIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
