Cases 1 - 8 of 8
In re: Elizabeth Coady, et al
as 25-2189
Petitioner:
In re: ELIZABETH COADY
Respondent:
DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States in hisindividual and official capacity, BARACK OBAMA, former President of the United States in hisindividual and official capacity, MICHAEL KRATSIOS, Director of the White House Office ofScience and Technology, in his individualand official committee and others
Coady v. Trump et al
as 1:2025cv00669
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Coady
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, Barack Obama, Michael Kratsios and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02468
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Trask v. Boyd et al
as 1:2011cv06907
Plaintiff:
Lois Trask
Defendant:
Thomas Boyd, Tom Dart, Janice Prescott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hendricks v. Harrison et al
as 1:2011cv04721
Plaintiff:
Sylvester J Hendricks
Defendant:
Dean Harrison, Barney McGrains, 2 Unknown Black Security Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRISON et al v. AQUA-CHEM, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv84566
Plaintiff:
HAROLD DEAN HARRISON and JACKIE LYNN HARRISON
Defendant:
AQUA-CHEM, INC., BORG-WARNER MORSE TEC, INC., CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Counter Claimant:
A. W. CHESTERTON COMPANY
Cross Defendant:
GENERAL REFRACTORIES COMPANY, GEORGIA PACIFIC CORPORATION, NATIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Harold Dean Harrison, et al. v. Aqua-Chem, Inc., et al.
as NCW/1:08-CV-00217
Plaintiff:
Harold Dean Harrison
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem, Inc
Harrison et al v. Aqua-Chem, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00217
Plaintiff:
Harold Dean Harrison and Jackie Lynn Harrison
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem, Inc., Borg-Warner Morse TEC, Inc., CertainTeed Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
