Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Gray v. Stevens Transport, Inc. et al
as 2:2026cv01958
Plaintiff:
Jabarri Gray
Defendant:
Stevens Transport, Inc. and Dean Michael Spence
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Ventura v. City and County of Honolulu, et al
as 1:2025cv00361
Plaintiff:
Dean Michael Ventura
Defendant:
City and County of Honolulu, Wallace Aina, Jared Nomura and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv08098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
(PC) Stevens v. Eyster et al
as 5:2025cv02439
Plaintiff:
Dean Michael Stevens
Defendant:
C. David Eyster, Anthony Delapo, Chris Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Stevens v. Nite
as 2:2025cv00785
Plaintiff:
Dean Michael Stevens
Defendant:
Shuge Nite
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stevens v. SBMC, et al
as 5:2025cv02298
Plaintiff:
Dean Michael Stevens
Defendant:
SBMC and Kymber Denevi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Stevens v. Eyster et al
as 2:2025cv00713
Plaintiff:
Dean Michael Stevens
Defendant:
C. David Eyster, Anthony Delapo, Chris Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Stevens v. SBMC et al
as 2:2025cv00609
Plaintiff:
Dean Michael Stevens
Defendant:
SBMC and Kymber Denevi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Stevens v. CDCR Director et al
as 2:2024cv03138
Defendant:
Hardman, CDCR Director and Gavin Newsom
Plaintiff:
Dean Michael Stevens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stevens v. CDCR Director et al
as 5:2024cv07716
Plaintiff:
Dean Michael Stevens
Defendant:
Hardman, CDCR Director and Gavin Newsom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
