Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Tacey Goss P.S. v. Barnhart et al
as 2:2013cv00800
Plaintiff:
Tacey Goss P.S.
Defendant:
Donna Barnhart , Women's Health Developers Inc , Chicfit Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Tacey Goss, P.S. v. Donna Barnhart, et al
as 13-35056
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TACEY GOSS, P.S., a Washington corporation
Defendant - Appellant:
DONNA BARNHART, individually, WOMEN'S HEALTH DEVELOPERS, INC., an Arkansas corporation, CHICFIT, INC., a Missouri company and others
Mary Bauer, et al v. Tacey Goss, P.S., et al
as 12-16621
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARY BAUER, CHICFIT, INC., JAMES BAUER, Jr. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
TACEY GOSS, P.S., a Washington professional services corporation, S. SHAWN TACEY, an individual resident in Washington, CLARK C. GOSS, III, an individual resident in Washington and others
Tacey Goss P.S. v. Barnhart, et al
as 2:2012cv00401
Plaintiff:
Tacey Goss P.S.
Defendant:
Donna Barnhart , Women's Health Developers, Inc. , Chicfit, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BIDAS et al v. ADAY et al
as 2:2011cv01147
Plaintiff:
TAGREED BIDAS , MOHAMMED BIDAS , AHMAD BIDAS and others
Defendant:
RAYMOND ADAY , CHRISMAN HEAVY HAULING, INC. , RANDALL VIRE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Harrell, et al
as 10-2153
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
J. B. HARRELL, JR., and his wife, Marie S. Harrell, MELISSA LEIGH HARRELL, Unknown Owner, DONALD HARRELL, and his Wife, Maryana N. Harrell and others
Defendant:
99,223.7238 ACRES OF LAND, more or less in Sandoval and Rio Arriba Counties, New Mexico, MAGMA POWER COMPANY, a Nevada Corporation - Unknown Owner, ERNESTINE BIRDSEY PHINNEY and others
Harrell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2008cv00320
Plaintiff:
Debbie Harrell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
