Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Pemberton v. Patton et al
as 6:2014cv00511
Plaintiff:
Paul Pemberton
Defendant:
Robert Patton, Justin Jones, Debbie L. Morton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Jones et al
as 6:2013cv00338
Plaintiff:
Reginald L. Phillips
Defendant:
Justin Jones , Mike Mullin , Jim Rabon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vickers vs. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2011cv00121
Plaintiff:
Christopher M Vickers
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Justin Jones, Bobbie Boone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hemphill v. Jones et al
as 6:2009cv00461
Petitioner:
Stacey L. Hemphill
Respondent:
Justin Jones, Leo Brown, Debbie L. Morton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lowery et al v. Edmondson et al
as 6:2009cv00286
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Lowery, James E. Lane and Elco Q. Pierce
Defendant:
Drew Edmondson, Justin Jones, Debbie L. Morton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barrett v. Orman et al
as 6:2009cv00064
Plaintiff:
Jacob Barrett
Defendant:
David Orman, Marty Sirmons, Debbie L. Morton and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Barrett v. Orman et al
as 0:2009cv00064
Plaintiff:
Jacob Barrett
Defendant:
David Orman, Marty Sirmons, Debbie L. Morton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ciempa v. Jones et al
as 4:2008cv00685
Plaintiff:
David Ciempa
Defendant:
Justin Jones, Walter Dinwiddle, Debbie L Morton and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Glass v. Jones et al
as 4:2007cv00182
Plaintiff:
Woody Glass
Defendant:
Justin Jones and Debbie L Morton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ali v. Dinwiddie et al
as 4:2007cv00059
Plaintiff:
Murtaza Ali
Defendant:
Walter Dinwiddle, Steven Beck, Anita Trammell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
