Cases 1 - 10 of 16
THOMAS v. KYRA COOPER et al
as 2:2023cv03230
Plaintiff:
CURTIS TYRONE THOMAS, JR.
Defendant:
KYRA COOPER, DEBORAH RYAN and THE DAILY LOCAL NEWS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
LEMUS v. SORBER et al
as 2:2021cv04354
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO JAVIER LEMUS
Respondent:
JAMIE SORBER, ESQ. DEBORAH RYAN, A.G. JOSH SHAPIRO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WERTZ v. RYAN
as 2:2021cv02129
Defendant:
DEBORAH RYAN
Plaintiff:
RICHARD W. WERTZ, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WERTZ v. RYAN
as 2:2021cv02130
Plaintiff:
RICHARD W. WERTZ, III
Defendant:
ESQ. DEBORAH RYAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RYAN et al v. ALLERGAN, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv01427
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN RYAN and DEBORAH RYAN
Defendant:
ALLERGAN, INC. and ALLERGAN USA, INC.
In Re:
IN RE: ALLERGAN BIOCELL TEXTURED BREAST IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Missud v. Shapero et al
as 3:2016mc80140
Plaintiff:
Patrick A. Missud
Defendant:
Kenneth Shapero, William Elfving, Deborah Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Deborah Ryan v. City of Detroit, et al
as 16-1557
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEBORAH RYAN, on behalf of herself individually, and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Patricia "Katie" Williams
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI, SERGEANT BARBARA KOZLOFF, in her individual capacity with the Detroit Police Department, INSPECTOR DWANE BLACKMON, in his individual capacity with the Detroit Police Department and others
Miroyan v. Ryan
as 3:2016cv01180
Plaintiff:
Michael H. Miroyan
Defendant:
Deborah Ryan and Jin Lang Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beal v. Ryan
as 3:2015cv05378
Plaintiff:
Charles Clifton Beal
Defendant:
Deborah Ryan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
