Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Quartus Stitt v. City of Decatur, et al
as 24-2884
Defendant:
CITY OF DECATUR, OFFICER DOES 1-10, in their individual and official capacities as officers of the Decatur Police Department and DECATUR POLICE DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff:
QUARTUS STITT
Carney v. Illinois State Police et al
as 2:2023cv02198
Plaintiff:
Adem G Carney
Defendant:
Illinois State Police, Decatur Police Department, Macon County Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stitt v. City of Decatur et al
as 2:2022cv02138
Plaintiff:
Quartus Stitt
Defendant:
City of Decatur, Decatur Police Department and Officer Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gordon v. Decatur Police Department
as 2:2021cv02168
Defendant:
Decatur Police Department
Plaintiff:
Roann Gordon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gordon v. Vercellino et al
as 2:2020cv02223
Defendant:
John Doe, 2, John Doe, 3, Peter Vercellino, Jr and others
Plaintiff:
Mikhail Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peck v. Hockaday et al
as 2:2020cv02098
Defendant:
Jeffery Hockaday and Decatur Police Department
Plaintiff:
Sean Peck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mahan v. Heatherton et al
as 2:2019cv02279
Defendant:
Dana Ray, . Belcher, Decatur Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley Lynn Mahan, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adam Smith v. Decatur Police Department, et al
as 18-2239
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADAM C. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
DECATUR POLICE DEPARTMENT, MACON COUNTY ANIMAL CONTROL, ANIMAL CONTROL WARDENS and others
Smith v. Decatur Police Department et al
as 2:2018cv02083
Plaintiff:
Adam Smith
Defendant:
Decatur Police Department, . Hughes, . Waggoner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barr v. Griffin et al
as 2:2018cv02030
Plaintiff:
Paul Barr
Defendant:
Thomas Griffin, Thomas Wheeler, Diane Couri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
