Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Defense Distributed, et al v. Attorney General New Jersey
as 23-3058
Plaintiff / Appellant: DEFENSE DISTRIBUTED and SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION INC
Defendant / Appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
VanDerStok v. Garland
as 23-10718
Plaintiff / Appellee: Jennifer VanDerStok, Michael G. Andren, Tactical Machining, L.L.C., a limited liability company and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: Blackhawk Manufacturing Group, Incorporated, doing business as 80 Percent Arms, Defense Distributed, Second Amendment Foundation, Incorporated and others
Defendant / Appellant: Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, United States Department of Justice, Steven Dettelbach, in his official capacity as Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and others
Amicus Curiae: Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition, Incorporated, Gun Owners for Safety, Everytown for Gun Safety Support Fund and others
DEFENSE DISTRIBUTED, ET AL. v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00849
Plaintiff: DEFENSE DISTRIBUTED and SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
VanDerStok v. Garland
as 23-10463
Intervenor Plaintiff: Defense Distributed and Second Amendment Foundation, Incorporated
Defendant / Appellant: Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, in his Official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, United States Department of Justice, Steven Dettelbach, in his official capacity as Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and others
VanDerStok et al v. Garland et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00691
Plaintiff: Jennifer VanDerStok, Michael G Andren, Tactical Machining LLC and others
Defendant: Merrick Garland, United States Department of Justice, Steven Dettelbach and others
Petitioner: Blackhawk Manufacturing Group Inc. d/b/a 80 Percent Arms
Amicus Curiae: Gun Owners for Safety, Jason Perry, Ryan Busse and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: Blackhawk Manufacturing Group Inc. doing business as 80 Percent Arms, Defense Distributed, Second Amendment Foundation Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Defense Distributed v. Platkin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-50669
Plaintiff / Appellant: Defense Distributed and Second Amendment Foundation, Incorporated
Defendant / Appellee: Matt Platkin, Attorney General of New Jersey, In His Official Capacity
Defense Distributed v. Grewal We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-50327
Plaintiff / Appellant: Second Amendment Foundation, Incorporated and Defense Distributed
Defendant / Appellee: Gurbir S. Grewal, Attorney General of New Jersey, in his official and individual capacities
DEFENSE DISTRIBUTED et al v. GREWAL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv09867
Plaintiff: SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, INC. and DEFENSE DISTRIBUTED
Defendant: Matthew Denn, Dictorate of Defense Trade Controls, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
State of Washington, et al v. Second Amendment Foundation, et al
as 20-35064
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF NEW YORK and others
Defendant / Appellant: SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, INC., CONN WILLIAMSON and SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION
Defendant: DIRECTORATE OF DEFENSE TRADE CONTROLS, US DEPARTMENT OF STATE, MIKE MILLER, in his official capacity as Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Trade Controls and others
State of Washington, et al v. Defense Distributed, et al
as 20-35030
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF NEW YORK and others
Defendant / Appellant: DEFENSE DISTRIBUTED
Defendant: DIRECTORATE OF DEFENSE TRADE CONTROLS, US DEPARTMENT OF STATE, MIKE MILLER, in his official capacity as Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Trade Controls and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?