Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Karns v. Deloitte Consulting LLP
as 1:2020cv09523
Defendant:
Deloitte Consulting LLP
Plaintiff:
Krystal Karns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr
Karns v. Deloitte Consulting LLP
as 1:2020cv04952
Defendant:
Deloitte Consulting LLP
Plaintiff:
Krystal Karns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv04077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv07073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
In Re: Rivada Networks
as 1:2017mc00001
In Re:
Rivada Networks
Interested Party:
Deloitte Consulting LLP
Cause Of Action: no cause specified
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS PUBLIC SECTOR, LLP v. USA
as 1:2016cv00098
Plaintiff:
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS PUBLIC SECTOR, LLP
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor_defendant:
ERNST & YOUNG LLP , BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON, INC. and DELOITTE CONSULTING, LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
Kormi v. Deloitte Consulting LLP
as 1:2012cv02595
Plaintiff:
Nagin Kormi
Defendant:
Deloitte Consulting LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
County of Marin v. Deloitte Consulting LLP et al
as 3:2011cv00381
Plaintiff:
County of Marin
Defendant:
Deloitte Consulting LLP , SAP America Inc , SAP Public Services Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Marvin Sicherman v. Thelen LLP, et al
as 09-3801
Appellant:
MARVIN A. SICHERMAN, Chapter 7 Trustee of
Defendant - Appellee:
DELOITTE LLP, DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP, DELOITTE CONSULTING LLP and others
Appellee:
THELEN LLP, formerly Thelen Reid Brown Raysman & Steiner, DAVID M. WARBURG and DELOITTE TOUCHE TOHMATSU
Sicherman v. Deloitte LLP et al
as 1:2008mc00053
Plaintiff:
Marvin A Sicherman, Marvin A Sicherman and Marvin A Sicherman
Defendant:
Deloitte LLP, Deloitte LLP, Deloitte & Touche LLP and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
