Cases 1 - 10 of 73
Bradacs v. Delta, County of et al
as 2:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Laura Bradacs
Defendant:
Delta, County of, Sherry Godfrey and Tom Sabor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal-Other Civil Rights
King (PS) v. Delta County Department of Health and Human Services
as 1:2023cv01801
Plaintiff:
Raymond W King
Defendant:
Delta County Department Of Health And Human Services, John F. Baier, Lindsey Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Havela et al v. Gogebic, County of et al
as 2:2023cv00124
Plaintiff:
Deborah Mason, Anita Demyers Hatchel, Guy Havela and others
Defendant:
Gogebic, County of, Lisa Hewitt, Sue Pertile and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wayside Church, et al v. Van Buren County, MI, et al
as 23-1471
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WAYSIDE CHURCH, an Illinois Not-For-Profit (Ecclesiastical) Corporation, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, HENDERSON HODGENS, Van Buren County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, JOHN G. RIECKMAN, Alger County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated in each of the aforesaid counties and others
Defendant:
VAN BUREN COUNTY, MI, in its individual Michigan municipal capacity and on behalf of a class of all other Michigan counties similarly situated
Appellant:
VISSER AND ASSOCIATES, PLLC, DONALD RAY VISSER, DONOVAN VISSER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ALGER COUNTY, MI, ALLEGAN COUNTY, MI, ANTRIM COUNTY, MI and others
Wayside Church, et al v. Van Buren County, MI, et al
as 23-1339
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WAYSIDE CHURCH, an Illinois Not-For-Profit (Ecclesiastical) Corporation, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, HENDERSON HODGENS, Van Buren County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, JOHN G. RIECKMAN, Alger County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated in each of the aforesaid counties and others
Intervenor:
TAYLOR BEIGHTOL
Defendant / Appellee:
VAN BUREN COUNTY, MI, in its individual Michigan municipal capacity and on behalf of a class of all other Michigan counties similarly situated, ALGER COUNTY, MI, ALLEGAN COUNTY, MI and others
In re: Frederick Grainger, Jr., et al
as 23-103
Petitioner:
In re: FREDERICK GRAINGER, JR., BRIAN BEHOVITZ, MINDY CALKINS and others
Respondent:
WAYSIDE CHURCH, an Illinois Not-For-Profit (Ecclesiastical) Corporation, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, HENDERSON HODGENS, Van Buren County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, JOHN G. RIECKMAN, Alger County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated in each of the aforesaid counties and others
Fingal et al v. Ontonagon County et al
as 2:2023cv00061
Plaintiff:
Daniel Fingal, Keith Kantor, Johanna McGee and others
Defendant:
Ontonagon County, Michele Smith, Alger County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Frederick Grainger, Jr. v. Ottawa County, MI, et al
as 23-1230
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK GRAINGER, JR.
Intervenor:
BRIAN BEHOVITZ
Defendant / Appellee:
OTTAWA COUNTY, MI, by its Board of Commissioners, AMANDA PRICE, in her individual and official capacity, BRADLEY SLAGH, in his individual capacity and others
First American Financial Corporation v. First American Title Company of Delta County, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
First American Financial Corporation
Defendant:
First American Title Company of Delta County, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Sattler et al v. Kent, County of et al
as 1:2022cv00316
Plaintiff:
Edward Sattler, Beckyann Crowley, William Viverette and others
Defendant:
Kent, County of, Mr. Peter Macgregor, Kenneth D. Parrish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
