Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Devon Gayles v. State of North Carolina Inc.
as 20-7842
Defendant / Appellee:
GARY G. HOSBEIN, Esquire, DENNIS M. WILEY, Magistrate, WARREN G. CLARK, District Executive and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEVON ARMOND GAYLES, a/k/a Devon A. Gayles El, In propria persona, proceeding sui juris, Moorish American National All Rights Reserved Ex rel
Gayles v. State of North Carolina Inc et al
as 1:2020cv00125
Plaintiff:
Devon Armond Gayles and Devon A. Gayles El
Defendant:
Tracy Boone, Paul L. Maloney, Mary Malesky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Pollack v. Holanchock
as 12-4307
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Marvin Arnold Pollack
Defendant - Appellee:
Howard Holanchock, Peggi Healy, Michael F. Hogan and others
Pollack v. Holanchock et al
as 12-3374
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Marvin Arnold Pollack
Defendant - Appellee:
Howard Holanchock, Peggi Healy, Michael F. Hogan and others
Pollack v. Holanchock et al
as 12-3269
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Marvin Arnold Pollack
Defendant - Appellee:
Howard Holanchock, Peggi Healy, Michael F. Hogan and others
Pollack v. Holanchock et al
as 12-2883
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Marvin Arnold Pollack
Defendant - Appellee:
Howard Holanchock, Peggi Healy, Michael F. Hogan and others
Pollack v. Holanchock et al
as 12-2419
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Marvin Arnold Pollack
Defendant - Appellee:
Howard Holanchock, Peggi Healy, Michael F. Hogan and others
Pollack v. Holanchock et al
as 12-2458
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Marvin Arnold Pollack
Defendant - Appellee:
Howard Holanchock, Peggi Healy, Michael F. Hogan and others
Pollack v. Holanchock et al
as 12-2448
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Marvin Arnold Pollack
Defendant - Appellee:
Howard Holanchock, Peggi Healy, Michael F. Hogan and others
Pollack v. Holanchock et al
as 11-5035
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Marvin Arnold Pollack
Defendant - Appellee:
Howard Holanchock, Peggi Healy, Michael F. Hogan and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
